Abstract
This article develops a current and controversial issue in criminal procedural law related to the full compensation incidents and it probative dynamic. Likewise, I show the different doctrinal positions about it: A first position, which considers that the admissibility and pertinence rules established for criminal procedure must be applied; The position according to which all the rules established for the civil process must be applied, and finally; An eclectic or intermediate position that established that the criminal procedural rules can not be applied in full and certain provisions of the civil adjective regime may apply.