Abstract
Conceived in the Political Constitution as the essential component of the responsibility of the State, the unlawful damage attributed by the action or omission of the administration with respect to the administered and the unlawful nature of the injuries caused constitutes in the national legal system a figure of alarming growth; implying for this, the construction of a defense agency that taxes towards the search for the financial sustainability of the State regarding the economic effects of the sentences for responsibility caused by its public entities. In that order of ideas, it is not strange to find that one of the objectives of entities of this nature is to prevent and resolve disputes of this nature through alternative mechanisms to the judicial apparatus such as conciliation, not only in terms of procedural requirements. but as an effective, expeditious and adequate tool to reduce the impact of configured unlawful damage. For this reason, in the present, it is sought through the study of the historical context and comparative law to create perspectives that merit the legal dialogue of the same to this framework of law with ample demonstration of judicial wear. Ilinca Paola Cerchar Palmezano