Palabras clave
indigenous people
digital divide
Internet
Covid-19
Cómo citar
Resumen
The objective of this article is to analyze the situation of the regulation of prior consultation in Peru, paying particular attention to the guarantee of the right to prior consultation during the State of emergency through the proposal of virtual prior consultation. To do this, we will analyze the recent scientific literature on prior consultation in Peru, the relevant regulations at the national and international level, as well as pronouncements from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on the proposal for virtual prior consultation. The article concludes that, in the case of virtual prior consultation, the IACHR's recommendations are clear in noting that, given the structural flaws, which include the existing digital divide in indigenous peoples, this measure would not make it possible to carry out a prior consultation that guarantees full participation, the formation of a free and informed will, as well as - considering the institutional deficiencies and disincentives noted with respect to the standard prior consultation-, if carried out, would exacerbate the existing disadvantage among indigenous peoples in the face of to the state.
Referencias
Alden Wily, L. (2018). Collective land ownership in the 21st century: Overview of global trends. Land, 7(2), 68. doi:10.3390/land7020068
Alva-Arévalo, A. (2019). A critical evaluation of the domestic standards of the right to prior consultation under the UNDRIP: lessons from the Peruvian case. The International Journal of Human Rights, 23(1-2), 234-248. doi:10.1080/13642987.2018.1562914.
Anaya Figueroa, T., Montalvo Castro, J., Calderón, A. I., & Arispe Alburqueque, C. (2021). Escuelas rurales en el Perú: factores que acentúan las brechas digitales en tiempos de pandemia (COVID-19) y recomendaciones para reducirlas. Educación, 30(58), 11-33.
Arellano-Yanguas, J. (2016). Mining policies in Humala’s Peru: A patchwork of improvised nationalism and corporate interests. In The Political Economy of Natural Resources and Development (pp. 196-212). Routledge.
Botero, D. I. R., & Galeano, C. A. P. (2017). Territories in Dispute: Tensions between ‘Extractivism’, Ethnic Rights, Local Governments and the Environment in Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru. In Alternative Pathways to Sustainable Development: Lessons from Latin America (pp. 269-290). Brill Nijhoff.
Callirgos, J. C. (2018). Neoliberal discourses and ethnonormative regime in post-recognition Peru: redefining hierarchies and identities. Cultural Studies, 32(3), 477-496. doi:10.1080/09502386.2017.1420088.
Candón-Mena, J. (2018). Riesgos y amenazas de Internet para la ciudadanía y la democracia. Más allá del alarmismo. CES contexto, 22, 38-47.
Celi, M. F. (2017). La implementación del Convenio 169 en los Andes peruanos:¿ de un nuevo espacio de participación a una oportunidad perdida?. Revista Andina de Estudios Políticos, 7(1), 77-100. doi:10.35004/raep.v7i1.52.
Cueto, S., Guerrero, G., León, J., Seguin, E., & Muñoz, I. (2012). Explaining and overcoming marginalization in education: Ethnic and language minorities in Peru. In Childhood Poverty (pp. 261-282). Palgrave Macmillan.
Cuya, A., Glikman, J. A., Groenendijk, J., Macdonald, D. W., Swaisgood, R. R., & Barocas, A. (2021). Socio-environmental perceptions and barriers to conservation engagement among artisanal small-scale gold mining communities in Southeastern Peru. Global Ecology and Conservation, 31, e01816.. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01816.
Damonte, G., Ulloa, A., Quiroga, C., & Navarro, D. (2020). Colombia. Gobernanzas plurales del agua: derechos al agua en contextos mineros en Perú y Colombia. Análisis & Propuesta; 48.
Due Process of Law Foundation (DPLF) & OXFAM. (2011). El Derecho a la consulta previa, libre e informada de los pueblos indígenas: La situación de Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador y Perú. DPLF & OXFAM.
Due Process of Law Foundation (DPLF) & OXFAM. (2015). Derecho a la consulta y al consentimiento previo, libre e informado en América Latina. Avances y desafíos para su implementación en Bolivia, Brasil, Chile, Colombia, Guatemala y Perú. DPLF & OXFAM.
Duque, G. (2021). Del control constitucional al control de convencionalidad: pasos jurídicos hacia la consolidación de instituciones de gobernanza global. Revista española de derecho constitucional, 41(123), 167-201. doi:10.18042/cepc/redc.123.06
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (2020). El impacto del COVID‐19 en los pueblos indígenas de América Latina ‐ Abya Yala: entre la invisibilización y la resistencia colectiva, Documentos de Proyectos (LC/TS.2020/171). https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/46543-impacto-covid-19-pueblos-indigenas-america-latina-abya-yala-la-invisibilizacion
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. (2020). Informe especial N° 7, Universalizar el acceso a las tecnologías digitales para enfrentar los efectos del COVID 19. CEPAL. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/45938/4/S2000550_es.pdf
El Peruano. (2022). Conecta Selva: 1,302 instituciones públicas ya acceden a internet satelital. https://elperuano.pe/noticia/174968-conecta-selva-1302-instituciones-publicas-ya-acceden-a-internet-satelital
Flemmer, R., & Schilling‐Vacaflor, A. (2016). Unfulfilled promises of the consultation approach: the limits to effective indigenous participation in Bolivia’s and Peru’s extractive industries. Third World Quarterly, 37(1), 172-188. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1092867.
Gil, A. G.; Linares, C. C. (2019). Mineralizing the right to prior consultation: from recognition to disregard of indigenous and peasant rights in Peru. Global Jurist, 20. doi:10.1515/gj-2019-0019.
Grazzi, M., & Vergara, S. (2012). ICT in developing countries: Are language barriers relevant? Evidence from Paraguay. Information Economics and Policy, 24(2), 161-171.
Himley, M. (2019). Extractivist geographies: Mining and development in late-nineteenth and early-twentieth-century Peru. Latin American Perspectives, 46, 27-46. doi:10.1177/0094582X18820274.
Ilizarbe, C. (2019). Intercultural disagreement: Implementing the right to prior consultation in Peru. Latin American Perspectives, 46(5), 143-157. doi:10.1177/0094582X19854098
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. (2020) Comunicado de Prensa N°. 103/20: La CIDH alerta sobre la especial vulnerabilidad de los pueblos indígenas frente a la pandemia de COVID-19 y llama a los Estados a tomar medidas específicas y acordes con su cultura y respeto a sus territorios. https://www.oas.org/es/IACHR/prensa/comunicados/2020/103.asp
Jamil, S. (2020). A widening digital divide and its impacts on existing social inequalities and democracy in Pakistan. In Digital Inequalities in the Global South (pp. 59-78). Palgrave Macmillan.
Kania, M. M. (2016). The rights of Indigenous Peoples in Peru: From socio-political marginalization to the modern principles of multiculturalism. Ad Americam. Journal of American Studies, (17), 11-32. doi:10.12797/AdAmericam.17.2016.17.02.
Luna, G.& Pariona, E. (2021) La consulta previa virtual en los derechos colectivos de los pueblos indígenas u originarios de la Provincia de Lucanas–Región Ayacucho-202 (Bachelor’s thesis: Universidad Cesar Vallejo).
Merino, R. (2014). Prior consultation law and the challenges of the new legal indigenism in Peru. Hendu–Revista Latino-Americana de Direitos Humanos, 5(1), 19-28. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.03.006.
Merino, R. (2015). Coloniality and indigenous territorial rights in the Peruvian Amazon: A critique of the prior consultation law. Bath Papers in International Development and Wellbeing Centre for Development Studies, 38.
Merino, R. (2017). Law and politics of indigenous self-determination: The meaning of the right to prior consultation. In Watson, I. (Ed.). Indigenous peoples as subjects of international law, Routledge, 121-140.
Merino, R. (2018). Re-politicizing participation or reframing environmental governance? Beyond indigenous’ prior consultation and citizen participation. World Development, 111, 75-83. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.025.
Merino, R. (2021). The Land of Nations: Indigenous Struggles for Property and Territory in International Law. American Journal of International Law, 115, 129-134. doi:10.1017/aju.2021.10.
Ministry of Culture of Peru. (2022). Base de datos de pueblos indígenas u originarios. https://bdpi.cultura.gob.pe/pueblos-indigenas.
Ministry of Culture of Peru. (2022). Consulta previa. https://consultaprevia.cultura.gob.pe/ (accessed on 20 May 2022).
Normore, A. H., & Lahera, A. I. (2020). Social Justice Leadership, Equity, and the Digital Divide. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
Ombudsman's Office of Peru (2022). Violencia en los conflictos sociales: Informe Defensorial No. 156. Defensoría del Pueblo. https://www.defensoria.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/informe-156.pdf.
Ombudsman's Office of Peru. (2021). Reporte de conflictos sociales N.° 213. https://www.defensoria.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Reporte-Mensual-de-Conflictos-Sociales-N%C2%B0-213-noviembre-2021.pdf
ONAMIAP. (2022a). Jóvenes indígenas de Cotabambas conocieron más sobre el uso de las redes sociales para hacer activismo digital. https://onamiap.org/2022/08/jovenes-indigenas-de-cotabambas-conocieron-mas-sobre-el-uso-de-las-redes-sociales-para-hacer-activismo-digital/
ONAMIAP. (2022b). Jóvenes indígenas de Ocuviri participan en taller de activismo digital para la defensa de sus derechos. https://onamiap.org/2022/05/activismodigitalocuviri22/
OXFAM. (2020). PRONUNCIAMIENTO: Consultas virtuales van contra el diálogo intercultural y el derecho a la consulta previa libre e informada de los pueblos indígenas u originarios, https://peru.oxfam.org/latest/stories/pronunciamiento-consultas-virtuales-van-contra-el-di%C3%A1logo-intercultural-y-el-derecho
Paredes, M. (2021). 7. Indigenous Activism and Human Rights NGOs in Peru: The Unexpected Consequences of Armed Conflict. In Politics after Violence (pp. 176-201). University of Texas Press.
Paredes, M., & Došek, T. (2020). The subnational indigenous quota in Peru: the paradoxes of political representation. Latin American Politics and Society, 62(3), 123-148. doi:10.1017/lap.2020.9.
Parsons, M., & Fisher, K. (2020). Indigenous peoples and transformations in freshwater governance and management. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 44, 124-139. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.03.006
Peruzzo, P. P., & Botelho, T. R. (2019). Diálogo intercultural, democracia deliberativa e participação política/diálogo intercultural, democracia deliberativa y participación política. Revista Jurídica Eletrônica da UFPI, 6(2).
Ratzmann, N. (2019). Intercultural dialogue: a review of conceptual and empirical issues relating to social transformation. UNESCO.
Rey-Coquais, S. (2021). Territorial experience and the making of global norms: How the Quellaveco dialogue roundtable changed the game of mining regulation in Peru. The extractive industries and society, 8, 55-63. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2020.05.002.
Rousseau, S. (2012). La Ley de Consulta Previa y las paradojas de la indigeneidad en la sierra del Perú. Argumentos, 6(5), 1-7.
Sarmiento, J. & Seedhouse, L. (2019). The truth and reconciliation commission and the law of prior consultation: Obstacles and opportunities for democratization and political participation in Peru. Latin American Perspectives, 46, 111-127, doi:10.1177/0094582X19857153.
Schilling, J., Flemmer, R., & Froese, R. (2021). A political ecology perspective on resource extraction and human security in Kenya, Bolivia and Peru. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(4), 100826. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2020.10.009.
Schilling-Vacaflor, A., & Flemmer, R. (2015). Conflict transformation through prior consultation? Lessons from Peru. Journal of Latin American Studies, 47, 811-839. doi:10.1017/S0022216X15000826.
Staley, K. (2022). The Extraction Industry in Latin America and the Protection of Indigenous Land and Natural Resource Rights: From Consultation Toward Free, Prior, and Informed Consent. Hastings Law Journal, 73(4), 1145.
Vílchez, K. M. R., Tupia, D. M. U., & de la Cruz, J. V. N. (2019). Una mirada crítica a la aplicación de la consulta previa en el Perú a propósito del 30° aniversario del Convenio 169 de la Organización Internacional del Trabajo. Lumen, 2(15), 214-229. doi.org/10.33539/lumen.2019.v15n2.1821.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2023 Civilizar